Thomas Bogendoerfer [off-list ref] 于2021年9月8日周三 下午5:36写道：

On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 10:08:47AM +0800, 陈飞扬 wrote:

quoted

On Tue, 7 Sept 2021 at 21:49, Jiaxun Yang [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

在 2021/9/7 14:16, FreeFlyingSheep 写道:

quoted

From: Feiyang Chen <redacted>

Convert mips syscall to use the generic entry infrastructure from
kernel/entry/*.

There are a few special things on mips:

- There is one type of syscall on mips32 (scall32-o32) and three types
of syscalls on mips64 (scall64-o32, scall64-n32 and scall64-n64). Now
convert to C code to handle different types of syscalls.

- For some special syscalls (e.g. fork, clone, clone3 and sysmips),
save_static_function() wrapper is used to save static registers. Now
SAVE_STATIC is used in handle_sys before calling do_syscall(), so the
save_static_function() wrapper can be removed.

- For sigreturn/rt_sigreturn and sysmips, inline assembly is used to
jump to syscall_exit directly for skipping setting the error flag and
restoring all registers. Now use regs->regs[27] to mark whether to
handle the error flag and always restore all registers in handle_sys,
so these functions can return normally as other architecture.

Hmm, that would give us overhead of register context on these syscalls.

I guess it's worthy?

Hi, Jiaxun,

Saving and restoring registers against different system calls can be
difficult due to the use of generic entry.
To avoid a lot of duplicate code, I think the overhead is worth it.

could you please provide numbers for that ? This code still runs
on low end MIPS CPUs for which overhead might mean a different
ballpark than some highend Loongson CPUs.

It shows ~2% regression for UnixBench on LOONGSON 3a4000 (a1901).

Thanks,

Yanteng