Re: [OpenRISC] [PATCH v6 1/9] locking/qspinlock: Add ARCH_USE_QUEUED_SPINLOCKS_XCHG32
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: 2021-04-07 09:48:38
Also in:
linux-riscv, linuxppc-dev, lkml, sparclinux
On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 08:52:08AM +0900, Stafford Horne wrote:
Why doesn't RISC-V add the xchg16 emulation code similar to OpenRISC? For OpenRISC we added xchg16 and xchg8 emulation code to enable qspinlocks. So one thought is with CONFIG_ARCH_USE_QUEUED_SPINLOCKS_XCHG32=y, can we remove our xchg16/xchg8 emulation code?
CONFIG_ARCH_USE_QUEUED_SPINLOCKS_XCHG32 is guaranteed crap. All the architectures that have wanted it are RISC style LL/SC archs, and for them a cmpxchg loop is a daft thing to do, since it reduces the chance of it behaving sanely. Why would we provide something that's known to be suboptimal? If an architecture chooses to not care about determinism and or fwd progress, then that's their choice. But not one, I feel, we should encourage.