On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 04:41:49PM +0100, Björn Töpel wrote:
On 2021-03-05 16:36, Alan Stern wrote:
quoted
On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 11:28:23AM +0100, Björn Töpel wrote:
quoted
From: Björn Töpel <redacted>
A misspelled invokation of git-grep, revealed that
-------------------^
Smetimes my brain is a little slow... Do you confirm that this is a
joke?
I wish, Alan. I wish.
Looks like I can only spel function names correctly.
Heh! I missed that one completely. Please see below for a wortschmied
commit.
Thanx, Paul
------------------------------------------------------------------------
commit 1c737ce34715db9431f6b034f92dbf09d954126d
Author: Björn Töpel [off-list ref]
Date: Fri Mar 5 11:28:23 2021 +0100
tools/memory-model: Fix smp_mb__after_spinlock() spelling
A misspelled git-grep regex revealed that smp_mb__after_spinlock()
was misspelled in explanation.txt.
This commit adds the missing "_" to smp_mb__after_spinlock().
Fixes: 1c27b644c0fd ("Automate memory-barriers.txt; provide Linux-kernel memory model")
[ paulmck: Apply Alan Stern commit-log feedback. ]
Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel [off-list ref]
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney [off-list ref]
diff --git a/tools/memory-model/Documentation/explanation.txt b/tools/memory-model/Documentation/explanation.txt
index f9d610d..5d72f31 100644
--- a/tools/memory-model/Documentation/explanation.txt
+++ b/tools/memory-model/Documentation/explanation.txt
@@ -2510,7 +2510,7 @@ they behave as follows:
smp_mb__after_atomic() orders po-earlier atomic updates and
the events preceding them against all po-later events;
- smp_mb_after_spinlock() orders po-earlier lock acquisition
+ smp_mb__after_spinlock() orders po-earlier lock acquisition
events and the events preceding them against all po-later
events.