Thread (24 messages) 24 messages, 3 authors, 2021-03-23

Re: [PATCH RFC v2 8/8] selftests/perf: Add kselftest for remove_on_exec

From: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Date: 2021-03-23 10:42:24
Also in: linux-fsdevel, linux-kselftest, lkml

On Tue, 23 Mar 2021 at 11:32, Peter Zijlstra [off-list ref] wrote:
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 10:52:41AM +0100, Marco Elver wrote:
quoted
with efs->func==__perf_event_enable. I believe it's sufficient to add

      mutex_lock(&parent_event->child_mutex);
      list_del_init(&event->child_list);
      mutex_unlock(&parent_event->child_mutex);

right before removing from context. With the version I have now (below
for completeness), extended torture with the above test results in no
more warnings and the test also passes.
quoted
+     list_for_each_entry_safe(event, next, &ctx->event_list, event_entry) {
+             struct perf_event *parent_event = event->parent;
+
+             if (!event->attr.remove_on_exec)
                      continue;

+             if (!is_kernel_event(event))
+                     perf_remove_from_owner(event);

+             modified = true;
+
+             if (parent_event) {
                      /*
+                      * Remove event from parent, to avoid race where the
+                      * parent concurrently iterates through its children to
+                      * enable, disable, or otherwise modify an event.
                       */
+                     mutex_lock(&parent_event->child_mutex);
+                     list_del_init(&event->child_list);
+                     mutex_unlock(&parent_event->child_mutex);
              }
                ^^^ this, right?

But that's something perf_event_exit_event() alread does. So then you're
worried about the order of things.
Correct. We somehow need to prohibit the parent from doing an
event_function_call() while we potentially deactivate the context with
perf_remove_from_context().
quoted
+
+             perf_remove_from_context(event, !!event->parent * DETACH_GROUP);
+             perf_event_exit_event(event, ctx, current, true);
      }
perf_event_release_kernel() first does perf_remove_from_context() and
then clears the child_list, and that makes sense because if we're there,
there's no external access anymore, the filedesc is gone and nobody will
be iterating child_list anymore.

perf_event_exit_task_context() and perf_event_exit_event() OTOH seem to
rely on ctx->task == TOMBSTONE to sabotage event_function_call() such
that if anybody is iterating the child_list, it'll NOP out.

But here we don't have neither, and thus need to worry about the order
vs child_list iteration.

I suppose we should stick sync_child_event() in there as well.

And at that point there's very little value in still using
perf_event_exit_event()... let me see if there's something to be done
about that.
I don't mind dropping use of perf_event_exit_event() and open coding
all of this. That would also avoid modifying perf_event_exit_event().

But I leave it to you what you think is nicest.

Thanks,
-- Marco
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help