Re: [RFC v8 13/20] um: lkl: integrate with irq infrastructure of UML
From: Hajime Tazaki <hidden>
Date: 2021-03-16 01:21:19
Also in:
linux-um
On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 05:45:23 +0900, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Wed, 2021-01-20 at 11:27 +0900, Hajime Tazaki wrote:quoted
static irqreturn_t um_timer(int irq, void *dev) { +#ifndef CONFIG_UMMODE_LIB if (get_current()->mm != NULL)Why is the ifdef needed - get_current()->mm should always be NULL for LKL? Surely get_current() must still work?
What we tried to ifdef is to avoid the following call; os_alarm_process(get_current()->mm->context.id.u.pid); because we didn't use/update get_current()->mm->context.id (struct mm_id) and calling kill(0, SIGALRM) makes a program puzzled thus, eliminate it.
quoted
sigemptyset(&sig_mask); sigaddset(&sig_mask, sig); - if (sigprocmask(SIG_UNBLOCK, &sig_mask, NULL) < 0) - panic("sigprocmask failed - errno = %d\n", errno); + if (pthread_sigmask(SIG_UNBLOCK, &sig_mask, NULL) < 0) + panic("pthread_sigmask failed - errno = %d\n", errno);UML doesn't normally link with libpthread, and LKL doesn't actually appear to require it either (since it has its lkl_thread and all), so this seems wrong?
I think both UML/LKL link with libpthread. See old
scripts/link-vmlinux.sh, or [01/20] patch.
- ${CC} ${CFLAGS_vmlinux} \
- ${strip_debug} \
- -o ${output} \
- -Wl,-T,${lds} \
- ${objects} \
- -lutil -lrt -lpthread
- rm -f linux
-- Hajime