Thread (28 messages) 28 messages, 5 authors, 2020-08-19

Re: [PATCH 1/2] lockdep: improve current->(hard|soft)irqs_enabled synchronisation with actual irq state

From: peterz@infradead.org
Date: 2020-08-12 10:37:19
Also in: linuxppc-dev, lkml

On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 06:18:28PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
Excerpts from peterz@infradead.org's message of August 7, 2020 9:11 pm:
quoted
What's wrong with something like this?

AFAICT there's no reason to actually try and add IRQ tracing here, it's
just a hand full of instructions at the most.
Because we may want to use that in other places as well, so it would
be nice to have tracing.

Hmm... also, I thought NMI context was free to call local_irq_save/restore
anyway so the bug would still be there in those cases?
NMI code has in_nmi() true, in which case the IRQ tracing is disabled
(except for x86 which has CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS_NMI).
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help