Thread (11 messages) 11 messages, 5 authors, 2020-06-01

RE: [PATCH 00/10] Hi,

From: Bharat Kumar Gogada <hidden>
Date: 2020-06-01 04:22:29
Also in: linux-mm

On 25. 02. 20 17:32, Rob Herring wrote:
quoted
On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 8:28 AM Michal Simek [off-list ref]
wrote:
quoted
quoted
Hi Rob,

On 14. 02. 20 0:47, Rob Herring wrote:
quoted
On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 2:58 AM Michal Simek
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted

I am sending this series as before SMP support.
Most of these patches are clean ups and should be easy to review
them. I expect there will be more discussions about SMP support.
While not really related to adding SMP, any chance you or someone
could look at moving microblaze PCI support to drivers/pci/? I
suspect much of the code should drop out as we have common helpers
for much of it now. That would leave only powerpc and mips for DT+PCI
platforms.
quoted
quoted
can you please suggest changes which could be done?
I have CC Bharat and he could look at it.
Look at the host controller drivers in drivers/pci/controller/.
pci-host-{generic,common}.c is a good template to start with as that's
a controller with standard config space accesses and no h/w setup
needed. Essentially you need to call devm_pci_alloc_host_bridge(),
pci_parse_request_of_pci_ranges() and pci_host_probe() with whatever
h/w setup you need in between those calls.

Looking at the microblaze PCI code, looks like you may need custom
config space accessors which is quite common. Probably all the
resource and device scanning can be removed. If you look at arm64, all
the arch PCI code is just for ACPI.
Hi Rob,

Can you please let us know why we might need custom config space accessors ?
We tested pci_generic_config_read/write accessors on microblaze, and we 
did not see any issues.

Regards,
Bharat
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help