Thread (97 messages) 97 messages, 8 authors, 2018-01-09

Re: [PATCH 16/67] powerpc: rename dma_direct_ to dma_nommu_

From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Date: 2018-01-03 06:24:09
Also in: linux-alpha, linux-arm-kernel, linux-iommu, linux-m68k, linux-mips, linux-s390, linux-sh, linuxppc-dev, lkml, sparclinux

Geert Uytterhoeven [off-list ref] writes:
On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 10:45 AM, Michael Ellerman [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Christoph Hellwig [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
We want to use the dma_direct_ namespace for a generic implementation,
so rename powerpc to the second best choice: dma_nommu_.
I'm not a fan of "nommu". Some of the users of direct ops *are* using an
IOMMU, they're just setting up a 1:1 mapping once at init time, rather
than mapping dynamically.

Though I don't have a good idea for a better name, maybe "1to1",
"linear", "premapped" ?
"identity"?
I think that would be wrong, but thanks for trying to help :)

The address on the device side is sometimes (often?) offset from the CPU
address. So eg. the device can DMA to RAM address 0x0 using address
0x800000000000000.

Identity would imply 0 == 0 etc.

I think "bijective" is the correct term, but that's probably a bit
esoteric.

cheers
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help