Thread (55 messages) 55 messages, 5 authors, 2018-01-17
STALE3053d REVIEWED: 1 (0M)
Revisions (5)
  1. v1 [diff vs current]
  2. v2 [diff vs current]
  3. v3 [diff vs current]
  4. v4 current
  5. v5 [diff vs current]

[PATCH 12/36] jfs: Define usercopy region in jfs_ip slab cache

From: Kees Cook <hidden>
Date: 2018-01-09 20:55:41
Also in: linux-fsdevel, linux-mm, lkml, netdev
Subsystem: filesystems (vfs and infrastructure), jfs filesystem, the rest · Maintainers: Alexander Viro, Christian Brauner, Dave Kleikamp, Linus Torvalds

From: David Windsor <redacted>

The jfs symlink pathnames, stored in struct jfs_inode_info.i_inline and
therefore contained in the jfs_ip slab cache, need to be copied to/from
userspace.

cache object allocation:
    fs/jfs/super.c:
        jfs_alloc_inode(...):
            ...
            jfs_inode = kmem_cache_alloc(jfs_inode_cachep, GFP_NOFS);
            ...
            return &jfs_inode->vfs_inode;

    fs/jfs/jfs_incore.h:
        JFS_IP(struct inode *inode):
            return container_of(inode, struct jfs_inode_info, vfs_inode);

    fs/jfs/inode.c:
        jfs_iget(...):
            ...
            inode->i_link = JFS_IP(inode)->i_inline;

example usage trace:
    readlink_copy+0x43/0x70
    vfs_readlink+0x62/0x110
    SyS_readlinkat+0x100/0x130

    fs/namei.c:
        readlink_copy(..., link):
            ...
            copy_to_user(..., link, len);

        (inlined in vfs_readlink)
        generic_readlink(dentry, ...):
            struct inode *inode = d_inode(dentry);
            const char *link = inode->i_link;
            ...
            readlink_copy(..., link);

In support of usercopy hardening, this patch defines a region in the
jfs_ip slab cache in which userspace copy operations are allowed.

This region is known as the slab cache's usercopy region. Slab caches
can now check that each dynamically sized copy operation involving
cache-managed memory falls entirely within the slab's usercopy region.

This patch is modified from Brad Spengler/PaX Team's PAX_USERCOPY
whitelisting code in the last public patch of grsecurity/PaX based on my
understanding of the code. Changes or omissions from the original code are
mine and don't reflect the original grsecurity/PaX code.

Signed-off-by: David Windsor <redacted>
[kees: adjust commit log, provide usage trace]
Cc: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@kernel.org>
Cc: jfs-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <redacted>
Acked-by: Dave Kleikamp <redacted>
---
 fs/jfs/super.c | 8 +++++---
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/jfs/super.c b/fs/jfs/super.c
index 90373aebfdca..1b9264fd54b6 100644
--- a/fs/jfs/super.c
+++ b/fs/jfs/super.c
@@ -965,9 +965,11 @@ static int __init init_jfs_fs(void)
 	int rc;
 
 	jfs_inode_cachep =
-	    kmem_cache_create("jfs_ip", sizeof(struct jfs_inode_info), 0,
-			    SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT|SLAB_MEM_SPREAD|SLAB_ACCOUNT,
-			    init_once);
+	    kmem_cache_create_usercopy("jfs_ip", sizeof(struct jfs_inode_info),
+			0, SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT|SLAB_MEM_SPREAD|SLAB_ACCOUNT,
+			offsetof(struct jfs_inode_info, i_inline),
+			sizeof_field(struct jfs_inode_info, i_inline),
+			init_once);
 	if (jfs_inode_cachep == NULL)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-- 
2.7.4
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help