Re: [PATCH 0/2] mm: introduce MAP_FIXED_SAFE
From: Michal Hocko <hidden>
Date: 2017-11-30 06:58:41
Also in:
linux-api, linux-mm, lkml
From: Michal Hocko <hidden>
Date: 2017-11-30 06:58:41
Also in:
linux-api, linux-mm, lkml
On Wed 29-11-17 14:25:36, Kees Cook wrote:
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 6:42 AM, Michal Hocko [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
The first patch introduced MAP_FIXED_SAFE which enforces the given address but unlike MAP_FIXED it fails with ENOMEM if the given range conflicts with an existing one. The flag is introduced as a completelyI still think this name should be better. "SAFE" doesn't say what it's safe from...
It is safe in a sense it doesn't perform any address space dangerous operations. mmap is _inherently_ about the address space so the context should be kind of clear.
MAP_FIXED_UNIQUE MAP_FIXED_ONCE MAP_FIXED_FRESH
Well, I can open a poll for the best name, but none of those you are proposing sound much better to me. Yeah, naming sucks... -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs