Re: [PATCH v7 08/36] x86/mm: Add support to enable SME in early boot processing
From: Tom Lendacky <hidden>
Date: 2017-06-21 15:15:05
Also in:
kexec, kvm, linux-efi, linux-iommu, linux-mm, lkml
On 6/21/2017 2:16 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Fri, 16 Jun 2017, Tom Lendacky wrote:quoted
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h index a105796..988b336 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h@@ -15,16 +15,24 @@ #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ +#include <linux/init.h> + #ifdef CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT extern unsigned long sme_me_mask; +void __init sme_enable(void); + #else /* !CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT */ #define sme_me_mask 0UL +static inline void __init sme_enable(void) { } + #endif /* CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT */ +unsigned long sme_get_me_mask(void);Why is this an unconditional function? Isn't the mask simply 0 when the MEM ENCRYPT support is disabled?
I made it unconditional because of the call from head_64.S. I can't make use of the C level static inline function and since the mask is not a variable if CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT is not configured (#defined to 0) I can't reference the variable directly. I could create a #define in head_64.S that changes this to load rax with the variable if CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT is configured or a zero if it's not or add a #ifdef at that point in the code directly. Thoughts on that?
quoted
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S b/arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S index 6225550..ef12729 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S@@ -78,7 +78,29 @@ startup_64: call __startup_64 popq %rsi - movq $(early_top_pgt - __START_KERNEL_map), %rax + /* + * Encrypt the kernel if SME is active. + * The real_mode_data address is in %rsi and that register can be + * clobbered by the called function so be sure to save it. + */ + push %rsi + call sme_encrypt_kernel + pop %rsiThat does not make any sense. Neither the call to sme_encrypt_kernel() nor the following call to sme_get_me_mask(). __startup_64() is already C code, so why can't you simply call that from __startup_64() in C and return the mask from there?
I was trying to keep it explicit as to what was happening, but I can move those calls into __startup_64(). I'll still need the call to sme_get_me_mask() in the secondary_startup_64 path, though (depending on your thoughts to the above response).
quoted
@@ -98,7 +120,20 @@ ENTRY(secondary_startup_64) /* Sanitize CPU configuration */ call verify_cpu - movq $(init_top_pgt - __START_KERNEL_map), %rax + /* + * Get the SME encryption mask. + * The encryption mask will be returned in %rax so we do an ADD + * below to be sure that the encryption mask is part of the + * value that will stored in %cr3. + * + * The real_mode_data address is in %rsi and that register can be + * clobbered by the called function so be sure to save it. + */ + push %rsi + call sme_get_me_mask + pop %rsiDo we really need a call here? The mask is established at this point, so it's either 0 when the encryption stuff is not compiled in or it can be retrieved from a variable which is accessible at this point.
Same as above, this can be updated based on the decided approach. Thanks, Tom
quoted
+ + addq $(init_top_pgt - __START_KERNEL_map), %rax 1: /* Enable PAE mode, PGE and LA57 */Thanks, tglx