Thread (126 messages) 126 messages, 9 authors, 2017-05-31

Re: [PATCH v5 15/32] efi: Update efi_mem_type() to return an error rather than 0

From: Borislav Petkov <hidden>
Date: 2017-05-07 22:08:20
Also in: kexec, kvm, linux-efi, linux-iommu, linux-mm, lkml

On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 04:19:00PM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote:
The efi_mem_type() function currently returns a 0, which maps to
EFI_RESERVED_TYPE, if the function is unable to find a memmap entry for
the supplied physical address. Returning EFI_RESERVED_TYPE implies that
a memmap entry exists, when it doesn't.  Instead of returning 0, change
the function to return a negative error value when no memmap entry is
found.

Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <redacted>
---
...
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/include/linux/efi.h b/include/linux/efi.h
index cd768a1..a27bb3f 100644
--- a/include/linux/efi.h
+++ b/include/linux/efi.h
@@ -973,7 +973,7 @@ static inline void efi_esrt_init(void) { }
 extern int efi_config_parse_tables(void *config_tables, int count, int sz,
 				   efi_config_table_type_t *arch_tables);
 extern u64 efi_get_iobase (void);
-extern u32 efi_mem_type (unsigned long phys_addr);
+extern int efi_mem_type (unsigned long phys_addr);
WARNING: space prohibited between function name and open parenthesis '('
#101: FILE: include/linux/efi.h:976:
+extern int efi_mem_type (unsigned long phys_addr);

Please integrate scripts/checkpatch.pl in your patch creation workflow.
Some of the warnings/errors *actually* make sense.

I know, the other function prototypes have a space too but that's not
our coding style. Looks like this trickled in from ia64, from looking at
arch/ia64/kernel/efi.c.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help