Thread (47 messages) 47 messages, 8 authors, 2017-04-05

Re: [PATCH 26/26] x86/mm: allow to have userspace mappings above 47-bits

From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Date: 2017-03-20 19:31:50
Also in: linux-mm, lkml

On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 11:08:41AM -0700, hpa@zytor.com wrote:
On March 19, 2017 1:26:58 AM PDT, "Kirill A. Shutemov" [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Mar 19, 2017 09:25, "Aneesh Kumar K.V" [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
What is the epectation when the hint addr is below 128TB but addr + len
128TB ? Should such mmap request fail ?
Yes, I believe so.
This *better* be conditional on some kind of settable limit.  Having a
barrier in the middle of the address space for no apparent reason to
"clean" software is insane.
I disagree with Kirill here.  If addr+len > 128TB, I think we should
assume the application is 57-bit aware.

Specifying hint addresses is such a rare thing to do anyway.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help