Re: [RFC PATCH-tip v2 1/6] locking/osq: Make lock/unlock proper acquire/release barrier
From: Waiman Long <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 19:09:04
Also in:
linux-alpha, linux-s390, lkml
From: Waiman Long <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 19:09:04
Also in:
linux-alpha, linux-s390, lkml
On 06/15/2016 01:12 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 09:56:59AM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:quoted
On Tue, 14 Jun 2016, Waiman Long wrote:quoted
+++ b/kernel/locking/osq_lock.c@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ bool osq_lock(struct optimistic_spin_queue *lock)* cmpxchg in an attempt to undo our queueing. */ - while (!READ_ONCE(node->locked)) { + while (!smp_load_acquire(&node->locked)) {Hmm this being a polling path, that barrier can get pretty expensive and last I checked it was unnecessary:I think he'll go rely on it later on. In any case, its fairly simple to cure, just add smp_acquire__after_ctrl_dep() at the end. If we bail because need_resched() we don't need the acquire I think.
Yes, I only need the acquire barrier when the locking is successful. Thanks for the suggestion. I will make the change accordingly. Cheers, Longman