Re: [RFC PATCH 03/15] Provide atomic_t functions implemented with ISO-C++11 atomics
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: 2016-05-19 07:45:48
Also in:
lkml
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: 2016-05-19 07:45:48
Also in:
lkml
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 08:36:49AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Wed, 2016-05-18 at 19:32 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:quoted
Does this generate 'sane' code for LL/SC archs? That is, a single LL/SC loop and not a loop around an LL/SC cmpxchg.The whole point of using compiler intrinsics and letting the compiler actually see what's going on... is that it bloody well should :)
Should and does be two different things of course ;-)