Re: [PATCH v6] fs: clear file privilege bits when mmap writing
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: 2016-01-10 21:10:51
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, linux-mm
On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 10:51:52PM +0300, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 10:30 PM, Al Viro [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 06:48:32PM +0300, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:quoted
I think this should be done in mmap/mprotect. Code in sys_mmap is trivial. In sys_mprotect you can check file_needs_remove_privs() and VM_SHARED under mmap_sem, then if needed grab reference to struct file from vma and clear suid after unlocking mmap_sem.Which vma? mprotect(2) can cover more than one mapping... You'd have to play interesting games to collect the set of affected struct file; it _might_ be doable (e.g. by using task_work_add() to have the damn thing trigger on the way to userland), but it would require some care to avoid hitting the same file more than once - it might, after all, be mmapped in more than one process, so racing mprotect() would need to be taken into account. Hell knows - might be doable, but I'm not sure it'll be any prettier.Ok, I didn't thought about that. mprotect don't have to be atomic for whole range -- we could drop mmap_sem, clear suid from one file and restart it for next vma and so on.
Won't be fun. Even aside of the user-visible behaviour changes, you'll have a lot of new corner cases, starting with the fact that you can't hold onto vma - virtual address is the best you can do and vma you find after regaining mmap_sem might start at lower address than one where you are restarting; getting the splitting-related logics right will be interesting, to put it mildly. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>