Thread (2 messages) 2 messages, 2 authors, 2015-09-20

Re: Drop IPC_OLD for direct ipc syscalls?

From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Date: 2015-09-20 13:28:12
Also in: linux-m68k, lkml

Hi Andreas,

On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 12:38 PM, Andreas Schwab [off-list ref] wrote:
Geert Uytterhoeven [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
Should I postpone wiring up the direct ipc syscalls on m68k (and thus renumber
__NR_membarrier) until the above is resolved, or can they go in in v4.3?
If you wire up the direct ipc calls know you create an ABI that is
harder to get rid of.
That's what I was mostly worried about.
Thanks for confirming!

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help