Thread (14 messages) 14 messages, 3 authors, 2015-08-26

Re: [PATCH v5 0/8] Add generic support for relaxed atomics

From: Will Deacon <hidden>
Date: 2015-08-07 16:29:29
Also in: lkml

On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 04:13:03PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 05:54:36PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
quoted
The series adds support for a family of relaxed atomics to the kernel.
More specifically:

  - acquire/release/relaxed flavours of xchg, cmpxchg and {add,sub}_return
  - atomic_read_acquire
  - atomic_set_release

This came out of a separate patch series porting the (barrier-heavy)
qrwlock code to arm64. Rather than have arch-specific hooks littered
around the place, it makes more sense to define a core set of relaxed
atomics that can be used regardless of architecture.

Changes since v4 are:

  * Drop the ret_t macro parameter in favour of typeof tricks (Peter Z)

  * Add a missing acquire to the qrwlock code, as it was based on a
    previous patch that I posted (Waiman Long)

Build tested on ARM, arm64, PowerPC and x86.
Queued it. There was a wee conflict with the atomic_{and,or,xor} bits
for the ARM patch, but that was quickly sorted.
Great, thanks Peter! I'll port arm64 over for 4.4 (there's way too much
fun being had in asm/atomic.h right now).
Does we want a Documentation/ update to reflect all this shiny new
stuff?
Possibly. atomic_ops or memory-barriers?

Will
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help