Re: [PATCH v3 05/15] h8300: Process and signal
From: Richard Weinberger <hidden>
Date: 2015-02-15 19:38:30
Also in:
lkml
From: Richard Weinberger <hidden>
Date: 2015-02-15 19:38:30
Also in:
lkml
On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Yoshinori Sato [off-list ref] wrote:
+ usig = current_thread_info()->exec_domain + && current_thread_info()->exec_domain->signal_invmap + && sig < 32 + ? current_thread_info()->exec_domain->signal_invmap[sig] + : sig;
Does h8300 really need signal mapping? I'm very sure you can drop this. In fact I'm working in patch set to rip it out tree wide as we have only a single (broken) in-tree user. -- Thanks, //richard