Re: [PATCH 2/4] arch: Add lightweight memory barriers fast_rmb() and fast_wmb()
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: 2014-11-18 01:43:14
Also in:
lkml, netdev
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: 2014-11-18 01:43:14
Also in:
lkml, netdev
On Mon, 2014-11-17 at 12:24 -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote:
Yes and no. So for example on ARM I used the dmb() operation, however I have to use the barrier at the system level instead of just the inner shared domain. However on many other architectures they are just the same as the smp_* variants. Basically the resultant code is somewhere between the smp and non-smp barriers in terms of what they cover.
There I don't quite follow you. You need to explain better especially in the documentation because otherwise people will get it wrong... If it's ordering in the coherent domain, I fail to see how a DMA agent is different than another processor when it comes to barriers, so I fail to see the difference with smp_* I understand the MMIO vs. memory issue, we do have the same on powerpc, but that other aspect eludes me. Ben.