On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 09:55:07AM +0000, James Hogan wrote:

Hi Stephen, Al,

On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 12:09:57PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:

quoted

On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 15:02:06 +0000 James Hogan [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Okay, I've rebased the metag tree from linux-next onto the master branch
of Al's signal tree (to get Vineet's GENERIC_SIGALTSTACK fix and
GENERIC_SIGALTSTACK's eventual removal).

OK, but I hope you mentioned not rebasing to Al.

I'm still rebasing the metag tree, and it's not quite ready for -next so
I don't mind if Al's tree rebases at this stage tbh.

Al: I don't know if you normally rebase your tree, but if it's okay with
you I'll let you know when I need it not to be rebased.

Umm...  
	1) #master is definitely bad for base; #for-linus is much safer (and
sufficient for your case)
	2) I'm a couple of fix folds away from opening #no-rebase (and yes,
it'll be a superset of #for-linus)

FWIW, I'd suggest a rebase on top of signal.git#for-linus.  Noting in
the stem is visibly relevant in your case, AFAICS...