Re: Sharing PCIE driver between Microblaze and Arm zynq
From: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
Date: 2012-12-07 18:52:20
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-devicetree, lkml
From: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
Date: 2012-12-07 18:52:20
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-devicetree, lkml
On 12/07/2012 02:17 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Thu, 6 Dec 2012 15:23:14 +0100, Michal Simek [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Hi guys, I have a question regarding to sharing generic OF pcie driver between two architectures MB and ARM Zynq. Is drivers/pci/pcie location good for it? Make no sense to have the same driver in two locations. Is using readl/writel IO functions in this driver the best option which we can have? Or is there any other recommendation?
Grant: What do you think about readl/iowrite usage in connection to PCI?
quoted
Also just want to check if it is correct to use pcie device_type. The rest should be the same with pci description: (http://devicetree.org/MPC5200:PCI#PCI_Address_Translation).Yes. device_type may be deprecated, but the PCI binding predates that.
If it is deprecated, there could be probably problem with early_init_dt_scan_memory() which is checking memory device_type (drivers/of/fdt.c).
PowerPC uses pcie in the device type. arch/powerpc/kernel/of_platform.c
ok. I see.
Some of that powerpc DT PCI support code really should be made generic.
yep. Thanks, Michal -- Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng) w: www.monstr.eu p: +42-0-721842854 Maintainer of Linux kernel 2.6 Microblaze Linux - http://www.monstr.eu/fdt/ Microblaze U-BOOT custodian