Re: [RFC Patch v1 33/55] ARC: ptrace support
From: Vineet Gupta <hidden>
Date: 2012-11-15 10:24:20
Also in:
lkml
On Monday 12 November 2012 07:21 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Monday 12 November 2012, Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com wrote:quoted
+ case PTRACE_PEEKUSR: + pos = addr; /* offset in struct user_regs_struct */ + count = 4; /* 1 register only */ + u_addr = (unsigned int __user *)data; + kbuf = NULL; + ret = genregs_get(child, NULL, pos, count, kbuf, u_addr); + break; + + case PTRACE_POKEUSR: + pos = addr; /* offset in struct user_regs_struct */ + count = 4; /* 1 register only */ + + /* Ideally @data would have abeen a user space buffer, from + * where, we do a copy_from_user. + * However this request only involves one word, which courtesy + * our ABI can be passed in a reg. + * regset interface however expects some buffer to copyin from + */ + kbuf = &data; + u_addr = NULL; + + ret = genregs_set(child, NULL, pos, count, kbuf, u_addr); + break; +I think these should be moved into regsets, as we have done for all other new architectures. Your arch_ptrace then becomes a trivial wrapper around ptrace_request.
The regset stuff is already complete - and even this code uses the reget callbacks. It's just that we need to carry on this dual ABI for some time for our legacy gdbserver.
Arnd