Thread (2 messages) flat view 2 messages, 2 authors, 2012-10-05

Re: [GIT PULL] Disintegrate UAPI for m68k

From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Date: 2012-10-05 07:03:41
Also in: linux-m68k, lkml

On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 9:51 PM, David Howells [off-list ref] wrote:
  git://git.infradead.org/users/dhowells/linux-headers.git disintegrate-m68k

for you to fetch changes up to b039235da939b28c539b3e1b4566107a9bdbdef8:

  UAPI: (Scripted) Disintegrate arch/m68k/include/asm (2012-10-04 18:20:56 +0100)

----------------------------------------------------------------
David Howells (6):
      UAPI: Fix the guards on various asm/unistd.h files
      UAPI: Split compound conditionals containing __KERNEL__ in Arm64
      Merge remote-tracking branch 'c6x/for-linux-next' into uapi-prep
      UAPI: Fix conditional header installation handling (notably kvm_para.h on m68k)
      UAPI: (Scripted) Disintegrate include/asm-generic
      UAPI: (Scripted) Disintegrate arch/m68k/include/asm

Mark Salter (2):
      c6x: make dsk6455 the default config
      c6x: remove c6x signal.h
I assume these c6x and asm-generic changes are the ones you just asked Linus
to pull? Doesn't it make more sense to ask us (the individual arch maintainers)
to pull our parts after Linus has pulled the generic part?

Do you want this ("our parts") to go in 3.7 or 3.8?

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help