Re: [PATCH v3 21/31] arm64: 32-bit (compat) applications support
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Date: 2012-09-13 15:51:33
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, lkml
Subsystem:
filesystems (vfs and infrastructure), the rest · Maintainers:
Alexander Viro, Christian Brauner, Linus Torvalds
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 12:03:27PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Thursday 13 September 2012, Catalin Marinas wrote:quoted
+#ifdef __ARCH_WANT_COMPAT_SYS_SENDFILE +asmlinkage int compat_sys_sendfile(int out_fd, int in_fd, + compat_off_t __user *offset, s32 count) +{ + mm_segment_t old_fs = get_fs(); + int ret; + off_t of; + + if (offset && get_user(of, offset)) + return -EFAULT; + + set_fs(KERNEL_DS); + ret = sys_sendfile(out_fd, in_fd, + offset ? (off_t __user *)&of : NULL, count); + set_fs(old_fs); + + if (offset && put_user(of, offset)) + return -EFAULT; + return ret; +} +#endif /* __ARCH_WANT_COMPAT_SYS_SENDFILE */Looking at this code in detail now, I think it's better to move the functions to fs/read_write.c and get rid of the get_fs/set_fs hack, like asmlinkage int compat_sys_sendfile(int out_fd, int in_fd, compat_off_t __user *offset, s32 count)
... It makes sense (copied below, just for compat_sys_sendfile until my comments below are clarified). One minor improvement, I think we should use compat_size_t for the count, it is a u32 in all cases.
This implementation is smaller and more efficient than the common one. Same for compat_sys_sendfile64, although I don't think there is ever a case where loff_t is defined differently from compat_loff_t, so you can probably just use the native sys_sendfile64 for the compat case.
That's what we do on AArch64, though powerpc and sparc define their own. The "count" argument would be different between compat and non-compat versions and I'm not sure what assumptions are made on the syscall entry path on these architectures (on AArch64 we ensure that the top 32-bit part of an X register is always 0 for 32-bit syscalls). Another difference is that the "count" argument for compat_sys_sendfile64 is s32 on powerpc and u32 on sparc. I can't tell whether it would make a difference in practice but if we use compat_size_t for the generic version the powerpc wouldn't get the sign extension. Powerpc has some comment about a need to treat in_fd/out_fd arguments as signed ints but I don't fully understand it (well, maybe powerpc needs the sign to be fully extended to 64-bit even for int). ----------8<----------------------- From 7c6747fc9f69d20f445e4af69c644acb04a74f45 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 09:51:10 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Add generic compat_sys_sendfile implementation This function is used by other architectures requiring compat support, so just make it generic. Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> --- fs/read_write.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++ include/linux/compat.h | 3 +++ 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/read_write.c b/fs/read_write.c
index 1adfb69..91b91c4 100644
--- a/fs/read_write.c
+++ b/fs/read_write.c@@ -1007,3 +1007,25 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE4(sendfile64, int, out_fd, int, in_fd, loff_t __user *, offset, si return do_sendfile(out_fd, in_fd, NULL, count, 0); } + +#ifdef __ARCH_WANT_COMPAT_SYS_SENDFILE +asmlinkage int compat_sys_sendfile(int out_fd, int in_fd, + compat_off_t __user *offset, compat_size_t count) +{ + loff_t pos; + off_t off; + ssize_t ret; + + if (offset) { + if (unlikely(get_user(off, offset))) + return -EFAULT; + pos = off; + ret = do_sendfile(out_fd, in_fd, &pos, count, MAX_NON_LFS); + if (unlikely(put_user(pos, offset))) + return -EFAULT; + return ret; + } + + return do_sendfile(out_fd, in_fd, NULL, count, 0); +} +#endif /* __ARCH_WANT_COMPAT_SYS_SENDFILE */
diff --git a/include/linux/compat.h b/include/linux/compat.h
index c4be3f5..f386e82 100644
--- a/include/linux/compat.h
+++ b/include/linux/compat.h@@ -594,6 +594,9 @@ asmlinkage ssize_t compat_sys_process_vm_writev(compat_pid_t pid, unsigned long liovcnt, const struct compat_iovec __user *rvec, unsigned long riovcnt, unsigned long flags); +asmlinkage int compat_sys_sendfile(int out_fd, int in_fd, + compat_off_t __user *offset, s32 count); + #else #define is_compat_task() (0)