Re: [RFC] page-table walkers vs memory order
From: Paul E. McKenney <hidden>
Date: 2012-07-30 20:30:44
Also in:
linux-mm, lkml
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 08:21:40PM +0100, Jamie Lokier wrote:
Paul E. McKenney wrote:quoted
quoted
Does some version of gcc, under the options which we insist upon, make such optimizations on any of the architectures which we support?Pretty much any production-quality compiler will do double-fetch and old-value-reuse optimizations, the former especially on 32-bit x86. I don't know of any production-quality compilers that do value speculation, which would make the compiler act like DEC Alpha hardware, and I would hope that if this does appear, (1) we would have warning and (2) it could be turned off. But there has been a lot of work on this topic, so we would be foolish to rule it out.GCC documentation for IA-64: -msched-ar-data-spec -mno-sched-ar-data-spec (En/Dis)able data speculative scheduling after reload. This results in generation of ld.a instructions and the corresponding check instructions (ld.c / chk.a). The default is 'enable'. I don't know if that results in value speculation of the relevant kind.
If I remember correctly, the chk.a instruction will detect failed speculation via cache state and deal with the situation correctly, but I really need to defer to someone with more recent IA-64 experience. Thanx, Paul -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>