Thread (21 messages) 21 messages, 6 authors, 2012-08-05

Re: [RFC] page-table walkers vs memory order

From: Paul E. McKenney <hidden>
Date: 2012-07-30 20:30:44
Also in: linux-mm, lkml

On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 08:21:40PM +0100, Jamie Lokier wrote:
Paul E. McKenney wrote:
quoted
quoted
Does some version of gcc, under the options which we insist upon,
make such optimizations on any of the architectures which we support?
Pretty much any production-quality compiler will do double-fetch
and old-value-reuse optimizations, the former especially on 32-bit
x86.  I don't know of any production-quality compilers that do value
speculation, which would make the compiler act like DEC Alpha hardware,
and I would hope that if this does appear, (1) we would have warning
and (2) it could be turned off.  But there has been a lot of work on
this topic, so we would be foolish to rule it out.
GCC documentation for IA-64:

   -msched-ar-data-spec
   -mno-sched-ar-data-spec
     (En/Dis)able data speculative scheduling after reload. This results
     in generation of ld.a instructions and the corresponding check
     instructions (ld.c / chk.a). The default is 'enable'.

I don't know if that results in value speculation of the relevant kind.
If I remember correctly, the chk.a instruction will detect failed
speculation via cache state and deal with the situation correctly,
but I really need to defer to someone with more recent IA-64 experience.

							Thanx, Paul

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help