Re: [PATCH 00/13] UAPI header file split

[PATCH 00/13] UAPI header file split · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2012-07-20
[PATCH 01/13] UAPI: Refer to the DRM UAPI headers with <...> and from certain headers only · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2012-07-20
[PATCH 02/13] UAPI: (Scripted) Remove redundant DRM UAPI header #inclusions from drivers/gpu/. · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2012-07-20
[PATCH 03/13] UAPI: (Scripted) Convert #include "..." to #include <path/...> in drivers/gpu/ · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2012-07-20
[PATCH 05/13] UAPI: Partition the header include path sets and add uapi/ header directories · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2012-07-20
Re: [PATCH 05/13] UAPI: Partition the header include path sets and add uapi/ header directories · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2012-07-21
Re: [PATCH 05/13] UAPI: Partition the header include path sets and add uapi/ header directories · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2012-07-21
[PATCH 06/13] UAPI: (Scripted) Set up UAPI Kbuild files · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2012-07-20
[PATCH 07/13] UAPI: x86: Fix the test_get_len tool · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2012-07-20
[PATCH 08/13] UAPI: x86: Fix insn_sanity build failure after UAPI split · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2012-07-20
[PATCH 09/13] UAPI: Set up uapi/asm/Kbuild.asm · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2012-07-20
[PATCH 10/13] UAPI: Move linux/version.h · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2012-07-20
[PATCH 11/13] UAPI: Remove the objhdr-y export list · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2012-07-20
[PATCH 12/13] UAPI: x86: Differentiate the generated UAPI and internal headers · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2012-07-20
[PATCH 13/13] UAPI: Plumb the UAPI Kbuilds into the user header installation and checking · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2012-07-20
[PATCH 04/13] UAPI: (Scripted) Convert #include "..." to #include <path/...> in kernel system headers · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2012-07-20
Re: [PATCH 00/13] UAPI header file split · Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> · 2012-07-23
Re: [PATCH 00/13] UAPI header file split · Michael Kerrisk <hidden> · 2012-07-24
Re: [PATCH 00/13] UAPI header file split · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2012-07-24
Re: [PATCH 00/13] UAPI header file split · Michael Kerrisk <hidden> · 2012-07-25
Re: [PATCH 00/13] UAPI header file split · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2012-07-25
Re: [PATCH 00/13] UAPI header file split · Michael Kerrisk <hidden> · 2012-07-25
Re: [PATCH 00/13] UAPI header file split · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2012-07-25
Re: [PATCH 00/13] UAPI header file split · Michael Kerrisk <hidden> · 2012-07-26
Re: [PATCH 00/13] UAPI header file split · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2012-07-26
Re: [PATCH 00/13] UAPI header file split · Michael Kerrisk <hidden> · 2012-07-26
Re: [PATCH 00/13] UAPI header file split · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2012-07-26
Re: [PATCH 00/13] UAPI header file split · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2012-07-25
Re: [PATCH 00/13] UAPI header file split · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2012-07-25
Re: [PATCH 00/13] UAPI header file split · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2012-07-25
Re: [PATCH 00/13] UAPI header file split · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2012-07-25
Re: [PATCH 00/13] UAPI header file split · Michael Kerrisk <hidden> · 2012-07-26
Re: [PATCH 00/13] UAPI header file split · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2012-07-26
Re: [PATCH 00/13] UAPI header file split · Michael Kerrisk <hidden> · 2012-07-27
Re: [PATCH 00/13] UAPI header file split · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2012-07-26
Re: [PATCH 00/13] UAPI header file split · Michael Kerrisk <hidden> · 2012-07-26
Re: [PATCH 00/13] UAPI header file split · Paul E. McKenney <hidden> · 2012-08-03

From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Date: 2012-07-24 13:19:29
Also in: lkml

Michael Kerrisk [off-list ref] wrote:

In the uapi-split branch, there are now 44 empty Kbuild files. Was
that intended? Or, should these files rather be removed by your
patches?

To be removed by a later patch, I think.  Getting rid of some of them isn't
trivial - ones in arch/x/include/asm/Kbuild for example - because that Kbuild
is referenced by common code IIRC as a function of the arch.

David

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help