On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Yinghai Lu [off-list ref] wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Bjorn Helgaas [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Yinghai Lu [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <redacted>
Cc: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
---
arch/ia64/include/asm/pci.h | 1 +
arch/ia64/pci/pci.c | 5 +++++
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/ia64/include/asm/pci.h b/arch/ia64/include/asm/pci.h
index b22e5f5..6e54220 100644
--- a/arch/ia64/include/asm/pci.h
+++ b/arch/ia64/include/asm/pci.h
@@ -94,6 +94,7 @@ struct pci_controller {
unsigned int windows;
struct pci_window *window;
+ struct resource busn;
Why do you add a new struct resource here? Can't you just use the one
passed in from acpi_pci_root_add()?
not quite sure about the life cycle for that object.
The struct acpi_pci_root is allocated in acpi_pci_root_add() and freed
in acpi_pci_root_remove(), so it should be safe for PCI to use.
Same thing applies for x86, of course.
Bjorn