[PATCH 16/40] microblaze: No need to reset handler if SA_ONESHOT

From
Matt Fleming <hidden>
Date
2012-02-14 11:48:38
Also in
lkml
Reply to
Matt Fleming, 2012-02-14
From: Matt Fleming <redacted>

get_signal_to_deliver() already resets the signal handler if
SA_ONESHOT is set in ka->sa.sa_flags, there's no need to do it again
in handle_signal(). Furthermore, because we were modifying
ka->sa.sa_handler (which is a copy of sighand->action[]) instead of
sighand->action[] the original code actually had no effect on signal
delivery.

Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
Cc: <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <redacted>
---
 arch/microblaze/kernel/signal.c |    3 ---
 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/microblaze/kernel/signal.c b/arch/microblaze/kernel/signal.c
index 90de06d..9e749c0 100644
--- a/arch/microblaze/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/arch/microblaze/kernel/signal.c
@@ -320,9 +320,6 @@ handle_signal(unsigned long sig, struct k_sigaction *ka,
 	else
 		setup_rt_frame(sig, ka, NULL, oldset, regs);
 
-	if (ka->sa.sa_flags & SA_ONESHOT)
-		ka->sa.sa_handler = SIG_DFL;
-
 	if (!(ka->sa.sa_flags & SA_NODEFER)) {
 		spin_lock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
 		sigorsets(&current->blocked,
-- 
1.7.4.4
Thread (61 messages) 61 messages, 9 authors, last reply 2012-04-06
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread / next series-diff position
kprevious message in thread / previous series-diff position
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help