Thread (23 messages) 23 messages, 1 author, 2012-02-11
STALE5224d
Revisions (3)
  1. v5 [diff vs current]
  2. v6 current
  3. v7 [diff vs current]

[PATCH 11/22] PCI: Strict checking of valid range for bridge

From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Date: 2012-02-11 04:07:23
Also in: linux-pci, lkml
Subsystem: pci subsystem, the rest · Maintainers: Bjorn Helgaas, Linus Torvalds

children bridges busn range should be able to be allocated from parent bus range.

to avoid overlapping between sibling bridges on same bus.

Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/pci/probe.c |   24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
index fcd9266..ca80141 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
@@ -770,6 +770,30 @@ reduce_needed_size:
 	return ret;
 }
 
+static int __devinit pci_bridge_check_busn_broken(struct pci_bus *bus,
+				struct pci_dev *dev,
+				int secondary, int subordinate)
+{
+	int broken = 0;
+
+	struct resource busn_res;
+	int ret;
+
+	memset(&busn_res, 0, sizeof(struct resource));
+	dev_printk(KERN_DEBUG, &dev->dev,
+		 "check if busn %02x-%02x is in busn_res: %pR\n",
+		 secondary, subordinate, &bus->busn_res);
+	ret = allocate_resource(&bus->busn_res, &busn_res,
+			 (subordinate - secondary + 1),
+			 secondary, subordinate,
+			 1, NULL, NULL);
+	if (ret)
+		broken = 1;
+	else
+		release_resource(&busn_res);
+
+	return broken;
+}
 /*
  * If it's a bridge, configure it and scan the bus behind it.
  * For CardBus bridges, we don't scan behind as the devices will
-- 
1.7.7
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help