Thread (31 messages) 31 messages, 8 authors, 2011-10-13

Re: [RFC/PULL 00/11] introduce export.h; reduce module.h usage

From: Paul Gortmaker <hidden>
Date: 2011-08-11 13:11:25
Also in: lkml

On 11-08-11 12:34 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 15:09, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
quoted
On 11-08-07 10:42 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:

[...]
quoted
Blackfin is broken because of this.  a simple grep of the tree
I've run all the in-tree blackfin configs, so it is all good.
so you made a change and it's all good <now> ?
Correct.
quoted
Have you thought about getting at least one blackfin defconfig in
the linux-next build coverage?  Gives you a better chance of
having people see when they've broken it.
all of the blackfin defconfigs get tested nightly in linux-next by an
ADI build machine.  i just didnt have a chance to review the logs as i
was traveling.
That is good, but as you've noted, it isn't something that anyone
else can see when they are combing the normal linux-next build
results below looking to see if they broke anything.

http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/branch/9/

Thanks,
Paul.
-mike
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help