Thread (23 messages) 23 messages, 8 authors, 2011-08-02

Re: [PATCHv4 05/11] omap3isp: Use *_dec_not_zero instead of *_add_unless

From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Date: 2011-08-01 11:09:59
Also in: linux-media, lkml

Hi Sven,

On Monday 01 August 2011 12:07:15 Sven Eckelmann wrote:
On Sunday 31 July 2011 17:00:43 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
quoted
On Wednesday 27 July 2011 11:47:44 Sven Eckelmann wrote:
quoted
atomic_dec_not_zero is defined for each architecture through
<linux/atomic.h> to provide the functionality of
atomic_add_unless(x, -1, 0).

Signed-off-by: Sven Eckelmann <sven@narfation.org>
Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Acked-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>

I'll queue this to my tree for v3.2. Please let me know if you would
rather push the patch through another tree.
The problem is that until now no one from linux-arch has applied the patch
01/11 in his tree (which is needed before this patch can be applied) and
you tree have to be based on the "yet to be chosen linux-arch tree".
Otherwise your tree will just break and not be acceptable for a pull
request.

Maybe it is easier when one person applies 01-11 after 02-11 was Acked-by
the responsible maintainers.

02 is more or less automatically Acked-by us :)
04, 09 and 10 are also Acked.
... and the rest is waiting for actions.
OK. I'm fine with 05/11 being pushed through any tree with my ack. Please let 
me know if/when you want me to apply it to my tree.

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help