Thread (23 messages) 23 messages, 9 authors, 2011-06-15

Re: [RFC,PATCH] Cleanup PC parallel port Kconfig

From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Date: 2011-06-14 20:25:46
Also in: linux-alpha, linux-arm-kernel, linux-m68k, linux-mips, linuxppc-dev

On 06/14/2011 12:08 PM, Ralf Baechle wrote:
The PC parallel port Kconfig as acquired one of those messy terms to
describe it's architecture dependencies:

       depends on (!SPARC64 || PCI) && !SPARC32 && !M32R && !FRV && \
               (!M68K || ISA) && !MN10300 && !AVR32 && !BLACKFIN

This isn't just ugly - it also almost certainly describes the dependencies
too coarse grainedly.  This is an attempt at cleaing the mess up.

I tried to faithfully aproximate the old behaviour but the existing
behaviour seems inacurate if not wrong for some architectures or platforms.
To improve on this I rely on comments from other arch and platforms
maintainers.  Any system that can take PCI multi-IO card or has a PC-style
parallel port on the mainboard should probably should now do a
select HAVE_PC_PARPORT.  And some arch Kconfig files should further
restrict the use of HAVE_PC_PARPORT to only those platforms that actually
need it.
Why on earth restrict it like that?  It's just a device driver, like
more or less any other device driver...

	-hpa
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help