Thread (6 messages) 6 messages, 4 authors, 2011-03-23

Re: [PATCH RESEND 1/2] vsprintf: introduce %pT format specifier

From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Date: 2011-03-23 13:43:48
Also in: lkml

On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 22:29 +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
The %pT format specifier is for stack backtrace. Its handler
sprint_trace() does symbol lookup using (address-1) to ensure
the address will not point outside of the function.

If there is a tail-call to the function marked "noreturn",
gcc optimized out the code after the call then causes saved
return address points outside of the function (i.e. the start
of the next function), so pollutes call trace somewhat.
This patch will fix it.

before:
[   18.345923] Call Trace:
[   18.346001]  [<ffffffff812a8502>] panic+0x8c/0x18d
[   18.346257]  [<ffffffffa000012a>] deep01+0x0/0x38 [test_panic]  <--- bad
[   18.346347]  [<ffffffff81104666>] proc_file_write+0x73/0x8d
[   18.346432]  [<ffffffff811000b3>] proc_reg_write+0x8d/0xac
[   18.346516]  [<ffffffff810c7d32>] vfs_write+0xa1/0xc5
[   18.346603]  [<ffffffff810c7e0f>] sys_write+0x45/0x6c
[   18.346801]  [<ffffffff8f02943b>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b

after:
[   22.224483] Call Trace:
[   22.224569]  [<ffffffff812bce69>] panic+0x8c/0x18d
[   22.224848]  [<ffffffffa000012a>] panic_write+0x20/0x20 [test_panic]  <--- ok
[   22.224979]  [<ffffffff81115fab>] proc_file_write+0x73/0x8d
[   22.225089]  [<ffffffff81111a5f>] proc_reg_write+0x8d/0xac
[   22.225199]  [<ffffffff810d90ee>] vfs_write+0xa1/0xc5
[   22.225304]  [<ffffffff810d91cb>] sys_write+0x45/0x6c
[   22.225408]  [<ffffffff812c07fb>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
Nice

Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>

-- Steve
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help