On Sat, 5 Mar 2011, Sam Ravnborg wrote:

On Sat, Mar 05, 2011 at 10:02:33PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:

quoted

On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 22:49, Thomas Gleixner [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <redacted>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
---
 arch/mn10300/Kconfig |    5 +----
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/arch/mn10300/Kconfig
===================================================================

--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/mn10300/Kconfig
+++ linux-2.6/arch/mn10300/Kconfig

@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@

 config MN10300
       def_bool y
       select HAVE_OPROFILE
+       select GENERIC_HARDIRQS

Wasn't this supposed to be "select HAVE_GENERIC_HARDIRQS"?

Crap, yes.

quoted

/me studying generic hardirqs...

One could hope this was nicely documented in kernel/irq/Kconfig.
But that file contains only 9 lines of comments for 10 config symbols.

Maybe it is just me but I was struggeling understanding the purpose
of these config symbols.

I found the individual bits of genirq nicely documented in most cases.
But the overall picture was/is hard to get.

And I never got enough understanding to write up something myself :-(

Point taken. /me goes and adds comments :)

      tglx