Re: [PATCH] sched: provide scheduler_ipi() callback in response to smp_send_reschedule()
From: Peter Zijlstra <hidden>
Date: 2011-01-17 20:43:03
Also in:
linux-alpha, linux-arm-kernel, linux-mips, linux-um, linuxppc-dev, virtualization, xen-devel
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2011-02-09 · [PATCH] sched: provide scheduler_ipi() callback in response to smp_send_reschedule() · peterz@infradead.org (Peter Zijlstra)
- 2011-02-09 · [PATCH] sched: provide scheduler_ipi() callback in response to smp_send_reschedule() · benh@kernel.crashing.org (Benjamin Herrenschmidt)
- 2011-02-07 · [PATCH] sched: provide scheduler_ipi() callback in response to smp_send_reschedule() · peterz@infradead.org (Peter Zijlstra)
- 2011-02-06 · [PATCH] sched: provide scheduler_ipi() callback in response to smp_send_reschedule() · benh@kernel.crashing.org (Benjamin Herrenschmidt)
- 2011-01-24 · Re: [PATCH] sched: provide scheduler_ipi() callback in response to smp_send_reschedule() · Ralf Baechle <hidden>
On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 07:31 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
Beware of false positive, I've used "fake" reschedule IPIs in the past for other things (like kicking a CPU out of sleep state for unrelated reasons). Nothing that I know that is upstream today but some of that might come back. I'd like to avoid having to add an atomic to know if it's a real reschedule, will the scheduler be smart enough to not bother with false positives ?
Yes it can deal with that, some will be for reschedules, some will be for ttwu tail ends and x86 too uses this ipi for a few random other things like kicking kvm out of guest context..