Thread (16 messages) 16 messages, 6 authors, 2011-01-03

Re: [patch 1/8] init: rename CONFIG_EMBEDDED to CONFIG_EXPERT

From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: 2011-01-03 20:11:33
Also in: lkml

On Thu, 30 Dec 2010 11:17:32 -0800 (PST)
David Rientjes [off-list ref] wrote:
On Thu, 30 Dec 2010, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
quoted
quoted
Doesn't this patch series break the 'bisectable' rule for patches?
I think you can get by with adding a CONFIG_EXPERT selects CONFIG_EMBEDDED
in the first patch and the last patch removing that same selects.
How about leaving it that way during the merge window even? That would
help people sending git pull requests that add new dependencies on
CONFIG_EMBEDDED. David can submit another patch that removes the
temporary CONFIG_EMBEDDED option along with any new users in -rc2
or for 2.6.39 then.
Ok, so there are a few pending EMBEDDED dependency additions in linux-next 
as of next-20101230, which should be a pretty good indicator of what type 
of conflict we might risk during the merge window.

 - three new defconfig files:

	89ba4d12: arch/arm/configs/ag5evm_defconfig
	6cfce27c: arch/arm/configs/omap1_defconfig 
	d58f0967: arch/blackfin/configs/BF561-EZKIT-SMP_defconfig 

 - 3ce05168 (drm/kms: load fbcon from drm_kms_helper)

 - b595076a (tree-wide: fix comment/printk typos)

Instead of CONFIG_EXPERT select CONFIG_EMBEDDED, we could add a ninth 
patch which does CONFIG_EMBEDDED select CONFIG_EXPERT and tag it in some 
way so we know it's only temporary for the merge window to find new 
CONFIG_EMBEDDED entries.

Andrew, this would be going through your -mm tree anyway, so how would you 
prefer to merge it?
um, one big patch shortly after -rc1 is released?
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help