Re: [PATCH] Introduce compat_u64 and compat_s64 types
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Date: 2007-06-15 12:10:56
Also in:
lkml
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Date: 2007-06-15 12:10:56
Also in:
lkml
Andi Kleen [off-list ref] wrote:
Why does it break them? It should just make them a little slower.
Not all CPUs deliver recoverable misalignment exceptions. This is probably particularly true of NOMMU-mode archs where the CPU designed may have taken the view that if a data exception is delivered, then the whole system is kaput anyway and must be restarted.
The network code requires unaligned accesses to work anyways so if your architecture doesn't support them it is already remotely crashable.
I thought we'd fixed all that. David