Re: new syscalls

From: Heiko Carstens <redacted>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 10:43:09 +0100

Any reason why arch/x86_64/ia32/ia32entry.S has sys_futimesat in its syscall
table instead of compat_sys_futimesat? Looks wrong to me...

I made the same mistake on sparc64 (because I used the x86_64 code as
a guide), thanks for pointing it out :)