Re: All archs: NO_IRQ definition
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Date: 2004-10-19 09:27:45
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Date: 2004-10-19 09:27:45
On Tue, 2004-10-19 at 10:22 +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 04:57:57PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:quoted
parisc-1 for parisc, please.
And also for every arch where there isn't an overriding reason for it _not_ to be -1. If either zero or -1 works, use -1. We'll get better coverage of random driver authors doing 'if (!irq)' that way. So your question becomes: anyone whose architecture can't cope with NO_IRQ being -1, please shout now before we break it.
BTW, we could just force everyone to add it themselves by merging this patch:
Do it. -- dwmw2