Thread (7 messages) 7 messages, 5 authors, 2004-10-20

Re: All archs: NO_IRQ definition

From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Date: 2004-10-19 09:27:45

On Tue, 2004-10-19 at 10:22 +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 04:57:57PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
quoted
parisc
-1 for parisc, please.
And also for every arch where there isn't an overriding reason for it
_not_ to be -1. If either zero or -1 works, use -1. We'll get better
coverage of random driver authors doing 'if (!irq)' that way. 

So your question becomes: anyone whose architecture can't cope with
NO_IRQ being -1, please shout now before we break it.
BTW, we could just force everyone to add it themselves by merging this
patch:
Do it.

-- 
dwmw2
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help