Re: [PATCH v5 02/22] liveupdate: luo_core: integrate with KHO
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Date: 2025-11-13 16:32:22
Also in:
linux-doc, linux-fsdevel, linux-mm, lkml
On Wed, Nov 12, 2025 at 09:58:27AM -0500, Pasha Tatashin wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2025 at 8:25 AM Mike Rapoport [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Hi Pasha, On Tue, Nov 11, 2025 at 03:57:39PM -0500, Pasha Tatashin wrote:quoted
Hi Mike, Thank you for review, my comments below:quoted
quoted
This is why this call is placed first in reboot(), before any irreversible reboot notifiers or shutdown callbacks are performed. If an allocation problem occurs in KHO, the error is simply reported back to userspace, and the live update update is safely aborted.The call to liveupdate_reboot() is just before kernel_kexec(). Why we don't move it there?Yes, I can move that call into kernel_kexec().quoted
And all the liveupdate_reboot() does if kho_finalize() fails it's massaging the error value before returning it to userspace. Why kernel_kexec() can't do the same?We could do that. It would look something like this: if (liveupdate_enabled()) kho_finalize(); Because we want to do kho_finalize() from kernel_kexec only when we do live update.quoted
quoted
quoted
This is fine. But what I don't like is that we can't use kho without liveupdate. We are making debugfs optional, we have a way to callThis is exactly the fix I proposed: 1. When live-update is enabled, always disable "finalize" debugfs API. 2. When live-update is disabled, always enable "finalize" debugfs API.
I don't mind the concept, what I do mind is sprinkling liveupdate_enabled() in KHO. How about we kill debugfs/kho/out/abort and make kho_finalize() overwrite an existing FDT if there was any? Abort was required to allow rollback for subsystems that had kho notifiers, but now notifiers are gone and kho_abort() only frees the memory serialization data. I don't see an issue with kho_finalize() from debugfs being a tad slower because of a call to kho_abort() and the liveupdate path anyway won't incur that penalty.
quoted
KHO should not call into liveupdate. That's layering violation. And "stateless KHO" does not really make it stateless, it only removes the memory serialization from kho_finalize(), but it's still required to pack the FDT.This touches on a point I've raised in the KHO sync meetings: to be effective, the "stateless KHO" work must also make subtree add/remove stateless. There should not be a separate "finalize" state just to finish the FDT. The KHO FDT is tiny (only one page), and there are only a handful of subtrees. Adding and removing subtrees is cheap; we should be able to open FDT, modify it, and finish FDT on every operation. There's no need for a special finalization state at kexec time. KHO should be totally stateless.
And as the first step we can drop 'if (!kho_out.finalized)' from kho_fill_kimage(). We might need to massage the check for valid FDT in kho_populate() to avoid unnecessary noise, but largely there's no issue with always passing KHO data in kimage.
Thanks, Pasha
-- Sincerely yours, Mike.