Thread (38 messages) 38 messages, 5 authors, 2025-10-20

Re: [PATCH v3 20/20] mm: stop maintaining the per-page mapcount of large folios (CONFIG_NO_PAGE_MAPCOUNT)

From: Wei Yang <hidden>
Date: 2025-10-14 12:23:38
Also in: cgroups, linux-doc, linux-fsdevel, linux-mm, lkml

On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 05:30:13PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
[...]
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
@@ -1678,6 +1726,22 @@ static __always_inline void __folio_remove_rmap(struct folio *folio,
		break;
	case RMAP_LEVEL_PMD:
	case RMAP_LEVEL_PUD:
+		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NO_PAGE_MAPCOUNT)) {
+			last = atomic_add_negative(-1, &folio->_entire_mapcount);
+			if (level == RMAP_LEVEL_PMD && last)
+				nr_pmdmapped = folio_large_nr_pages(folio);
+			nr = folio_dec_return_large_mapcount(folio, vma);
+			if (!nr) {
+				/* Now completely unmapped. */
+				nr = folio_large_nr_pages(folio);
+			} else {
+				partially_mapped = last &&
+						   nr < folio_large_nr_pages(folio);
Hi, David

Do you think this is better to be?

	partially_mapped = last && nr < nr_pmdmapped;

As commit 349994cf61e6 mentioned, we don't support partially mapped PUD-sized
folio yet.

Not sure what I missed here.
+				nr = 0;
+			}
+			break;
+		}
+
		folio_dec_large_mapcount(folio, vma);
		last = atomic_add_negative(-1, &folio->_entire_mapcount);
		if (last) {
-- 
2.48.1
-- 
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help