Hi Aleksa,

On Wed, Sep 24, 2025 at 04:31:15PM +1000, Aleksa Sarai wrote:

On 2025-09-21, Alejandro Colomar [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Fri, Sep 19, 2025 at 11:59:50AM +1000, Aleksa Sarai wrote:

quoted

diff --git a/man/man2/open_tree.2 b/man/man2/open_tree.2
index 7f85df08b43c7b48a9d021dbbeb2c60092a2b2d4..60de4313a9d5be4ef3ff1217051f252506a2ade9 100644
--- a/man/man2/open_tree.2
+++ b/man/man2/open_tree.2

@@ -15,7 +15,19 @@ .SH SYNOPSIS
 .B #include <sys/mount.h>
 .P
 .BI "int open_tree(int " dirfd ", const char *" path ", unsigned int " flags );
+.P
+.BR "#include <sys/syscall.h>" "    /* Definition of " SYS_* " constants */"
+.P
+.BI "int syscall(SYS_open_tree_attr, int " dirfd ", const char *" path ,
+.BI "            unsigned int " flags ", struct mount_attr *_Nullable " attr ", \
+size_t " size );

Do we maybe want to move this to its own separate page?

The separate page could perfectly contain the same exact text you're
adding here; you don't need to repeat open_tree() descriptions.

In general, I feel that while this improves discoverability of related
functions, it produces more complex pages.

I tried it and I don't think it is a better experience as a reader when
split into two pages because of the huge overlap between the two
syscalls.

Okay.  Thanks!


Have a lovely day!
Alex

-- 
<https://www.alejandro-colomar.es>
Use port 80 (that is, <...:80/>).