Re: [RFC v3 1/4] kernel/api: introduce kernel API specification framework

On Wed, Jul 16, 2025 at 10:21:41AM +0300, Askar Safin wrote:

quoted

+   KAPI_PARAM_IN       = (1 << 0),
+   KAPI_PARAM_OUT      = (1 << 1),
+   KAPI_PARAM_INOUT    = (1 << 2),

There is no need for KAPI_PARAM_INOUT. It could be replaced by KAPI_PARAM_IN | KAPI_PARAM_OUT

It could, but it's easier to write _INOUT :)

-- 
Thanks,
Sasha