Re: [PATCH] seccomp: passthrough uretprobe systemcall without filtering
From: Eyal Birger <hidden>
Date: 2025-01-17 13:36:46
Also in:
bpf, linux-trace-kernel, lkml, stable
On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 12:02 AM Masami Hiramatsu [off-list ref] wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jan 2025 02:39:28 +0100 Oleg Nesterov [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On 01/16, Eyal Birger wrote:quoted
Fixes: ff474a78cef5 ("uprobe: Add uretprobe syscall to speed up return probe") Reported-by: Rafael Buchbinder <redacted> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHsH6Gs3Eh8DFU0wq58c_LF8A4_+o6z456J7BidmcVY2AqOnHQ@mail.gmail.com/ (local) Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org...quoted
@@ -1359,6 +1359,11 @@ int __secure_computing(const struct seccomp_data *sd) this_syscall = sd ? sd->nr : syscall_get_nr(current, current_pt_regs()); +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64 + if (unlikely(this_syscall == __NR_uretprobe) && !in_ia32_syscall()) + return 0; +#endifAcked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> A note for the seccomp maintainers... I don't know what do you think, but I agree in advance that the very fact this patch adds "#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64" into __secure_computing() doesn't look nice.Indeed. in_ia32_syscall() depends arch/x86 too. We can add an inline function like; ``` uprobes.h static inline bool is_uprobe_syscall(int syscall) { // arch_is_uprobe_syscall check can be replaced by Kconfig, // something like CONFIG_ARCH_URETPROBE_SYSCALL. #ifdef arch_is_uprobe_syscall return arch_is_uprobe_syscall(syscall) #else return false; #endif }and ``` arch/x86/include/asm/uprobes.h #define arch_is_uprobe_syscall(syscall) \ (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_64) && syscall == __NR_uretprobe && !in_ia32_syscall())
Notice it'll need to be enclosed in ifdef CONFIG_X86_64 as __NR_uretprobe isn't defined otherwise so the IS_ENABLED isn't needed.
quoted
The problem is that we need a simple patch for -stable which fixes the real problem. We can cleanup this logic later, I think.Hmm, at least we should make it is_uprobe_syscall() in uprobes.h so that do not pollute the seccomp subsystem with #ifdef.
I like this approach. Notice it does add a couple of includes that weren't there before: - arch/x86/include/asm/uprobes.h would include asm/unistd.h - seccomp.c would include linux/uprobes.h So it's a less "trivial" patch... If that's ok I can repost with these changes. Eyal.