On 11/5/24 7:50 PM, Matt Muggeridge wrote:

I'm a little surprised by this consideration. If we account for poorly
written buggy user-programs, doesn't this open any API to an explosion
of new attributes or other odd extensions? I'd imagine the same argument

yes, it does and there are many examples. UAPIs are hard to get right
yet persistent forever, so I do agree with Ido's push back on making
sure it is needed.