Re: [PATCH RFC v3 0/2] fhandle: expose u64 mount id to name_to_handle_at(2)
From: Aleksa Sarai <hidden>
Date: 2024-08-02 01:44:13
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, linux-nfs, linux-perf-users, lkml
On 2024-08-01, Josef Bacik [off-list ref] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 01, 2024 at 01:52:39PM +1000, Aleksa Sarai wrote:quoted
Now that we provide a unique 64-bit mount ID interface in statx(2), we can now provide a race-free way for name_to_handle_at(2) to provide a file handle and corresponding mount without needing to worry about racing with /proc/mountinfo parsing or having to open a file just to do statx(2). While this is not necessary if you are using AT_EMPTY_PATH and don't care about an extra statx(2) call, users that pass full paths into name_to_handle_at(2) need to know which mount the file handle comes from (to make sure they don't try to open_by_handle_at a file handle from a different filesystem) and switching to AT_EMPTY_PATH would require allocating a file for every name_to_handle_at(2) call, turning err = name_to_handle_at(-EBADF, "/foo/bar/baz", &handle, &mntid, AT_HANDLE_MNT_ID_UNIQUE); into int fd = openat(-EBADF, "/foo/bar/baz", O_PATH | O_CLOEXEC); err1 = name_to_handle_at(fd, "", &handle, &unused_mntid, AT_EMPTY_PATH); err2 = statx(fd, "", AT_EMPTY_PATH, STATX_MNT_ID_UNIQUE, &statxbuf); mntid = statxbuf.stx_mnt_id; close(fd); Also, this series adds a patch to clarify how AT_* flag allocation should work going forwards. Signed-off-by: Aleksa Sarai <redacted> --- Changes in v3: - Added a patch describing how AT_* flags should be allocated in the future, based on Amir's suggestions. - Included AT_* aliases for RENAME_* flags to further indicate that renameat2(2) is an *at(2) syscall and to indicate that those flags have been allocated already in the per-syscall range. - Switched AT_HANDLE_MNT_ID_UNIQUE to use 0x01 (to reuse (AT_)RENAME_NOREPLACE). - v2: <https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240523-exportfs-u64-mount-id-v2-1-f9f959f17eb1@cyphar.com (local)> Changes in v2: - Fixed a few minor compiler warnings and a buggy copy_to_user() check. - Rename AT_HANDLE_UNIQUE_MOUNT_ID -> AT_HANDLE_MNT_ID_UNIQUE to match statx. - Switched to using an AT_* bit from 0xFF and defining that range as being "per-syscall" for future usage. - Sync tools/ copy of <linux/fcntl.h> to include changes. - v1: <https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240520-exportfs-u64-mount-id-v1-1-f55fd9215b8e@cyphar.com (local)> --- Aleksa Sarai (2): uapi: explain how per-syscall AT_* flags should be allocated fhandle: expose u64 mount id to name_to_handle_at(2)Wasn't the conclusion from this discussion last time that we needed to revisit this API completely? Christoph had some pretty adamant objections.
There was a discussion about reworking the API and I agree with most of the issues raised about file handles (I personally don't really like this interface and it's a bit of a shame that it seems this is going to be the interface that replaces inode numbers) so I'm not at all opposed to reworking it. However, I agree with Christian[1] that we can fix this existing issue in the existing API fairly easily and then work on a new API separately. The existing usage of name_to_handle_at() is fundamentally unsafe (as outlined in the man page) and we can fix that fairly easily. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240527-hagel-thunfisch-75781b0cf75d@brauner/ (local)
That being said the uapi comments patch looks good to me, you can add Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> to that one. The other one I'm going to let others who have stronger opinions than me argue about. Thanks, Josef
-- Aleksa Sarai Senior Software Engineer (Containers) SUSE Linux GmbH <https://www.cyphar.com/>
Attachments
- signature.asc [application/pgp-signature] 228 bytes