On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 06:37:22PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
quoted
--- a/kernel/pid.c
+++ b/kernel/pid.c
@@ -688,7 +688,7 @@ static int pidfd_getfd(struct pid *pid, int fd)
int ret;
task = get_pid_task(pid, PIDTYPE_PID);
- if (!task)
+ if (!task || task->flags & PF_EXITING)
return -ESRCH;
This looks racy. Suppose that pidfd_getfd() races with the exiting task.
It is possible that this task sets PF_EXITING and does exit_files()
after the "task->flags & PF_EXITING" check above and before pidfd_getfd()
does __pidfd_fget(), in this case pidfd_getfd() still returns the same
EBADF we want to avoid.
Perhaps we can change pidfd_getfd() to do
if (IS_ERR(file))
return (task->flags & PF_EXITING) ? -ESRCH : PTR_ERR(file);
instead?
This needs a comment to explain the PF_EXITING check. And perhaps another
comment to explain that we can't miss PF_EXITING if the target task has
already passed exit_files, both exit_files() and fget_task() take the same
task_lock(task).
What do you think?
Yes, you're absolutely right. Let me resend.
Tycho