Thread (24 messages) flat view 24 messages, 5 authors, 2024-02-05

Re: [net-next 0/3] Per epoll context busy poll support

From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Date: 2024-02-05 19:59:57
Also in: lkml, netdev

On Mon, 5 Feb 2024 10:51:30 -0800 Joe Damato wrote:
quoted
We reused the gro_flush_timeout as an existing "user doesn't care if
packets get delayed by this much in worst case" value. If you set
SO_PREFER_BUSY_POLL the next time you busy pool the NAPI will be marked 
as "already scheduled" and a timer is set (to gro_flush_timeout).
If NIC IRQ fires before gro_flush_timeout it gets ignored, because NAPI
is already marked as scheduled.
If you busy poll again the timer gets postponed for another
gro_flush_timeout nsec.
If timer fires we go back to normal NAPI processing.  
Ah, I see. From my reading of the code in busy_poll_stop (which could be
wrong), defer_hard_irqs_count must also be non-zero to postpone the timer.

Is that right?

If so, I think the tricky thing with this is that these settings are
system-wide, so they'd affect non-busy poll apps, too.

I think in the ideal case being able to set these on a per-NAPI basis would
be very helpful. Maybe something for me to try working on next.
If wonder if it'd be good enough to do:

	min(defer_hard_irqs_count, 1)

there. If caller asked to prefer busy poll they clearly want to poll.
An explicit per-NAPI API works too, but it's a bit more work.
If I was doing the work I'd try min(..., 1) with the workload.
If there's value in having the full config - go for it.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help