Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] pidfd: allow pidfd_open() on non-thread-group leaders
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Date: 2024-01-25 17:52:34
Also in:
lkml
On 01/25, Christian Brauner wrote:
quoted
quoted
When it is reaped is "mostly unrelated".Then why pidfd_poll() can't simply check !task || task->exit_state ? Nevermind. So, currently pidfd_poll() succeeds when the leader can beHm, the comment right above mentions: /* * Inform pollers only when the whole thread group exits. * If the thread group leader exits before all other threads in the * group, then poll(2) should block, similar to the wait(2) family. */quoted
reaped, iow the whole thread group has exited.
Yes, but the comment doesn't contradict with what I have said?
quoted
But even if you are the parent, you can't expect that wait(WNOHANG) must succeed, the leader can be traced. I guess it is too late to change this behaviour.Hm, why is that an issue though?
Well, I didn't say this is a problem. I simply do not know how/why people use pidfd_poll(). I mostly tried to explain why do I think that do_notify_pidfd() should be always called from exit_notify() path, not by release_task(), even if the task is not a leader.
Because a program would rely on WNOHANG to hang on a ptraced leader? That seems esoteric imho.
To me it would be usefule, but lets not discuss this now. The "patch" I sent doesn't change the current behaviour.
quoted
What if we add the new PIDFD_THREAD flag? With this flag - sys_pidfd_open() doesn't require the must be a group leaderYes.quoted
- pidfd_poll() succeeds when the task passes exit_notify() and becomes a zombie, even if it is a leader and has other threads.Iiuc, if an existing user creates a pidfd for a thread-group leader and then polls that pidfd they would currently only get notified if the thread-group is empty and the leader has exited. If we now start notifying when the thread-group leader exits but the thread-group isn't empty then this would be a fairly big api change
Hmm... again, this patch doesn't (shouldn't) change the current behavior. Please note "with this flag" above. If sys_pidfd_open() was called without PIDFD_THREAD, then sys_pidfd_open() still requires that the target task must be a group leader, and pidfd_poll() won't succeed until the leader exits and thread_group_empty() is true. Oleg.